News

Why Remanufacturing is the Superior Choice

In celebration of International Recycling Day on 17th May, it’s important to explore sustainable practices in the printing industry. While recycling is often regarded as an environmentally responsible choice, remanufacturing offers even greater advantages for printing equipment in terms of quality, performance, and compliance with new EU regulations that actively promote refurbished devices.

The main distinction between recycling and remanufacturing lies in the thoroughness of the restoration. Recycling typically involves recovering materials from a used printer, sometimes carrying out minor repairs before resale as second-hand equipment. However, this can lead to inconsistent performance and limited warranty coverage.

Remanufacturing, in contrast, is a comprehensive process. Printers are fully disassembled, with any worn or faulty components replaced by high-quality parts. Each device is then rigorously tested to meet or exceed OEM standards, ensuring it performs as well as—if not better than—a new printer. This process delivers a product with consistent performance, backed by a full warranty that assures quality and durability.

New EU regulations further support remanufacturing over recycling, encouraging businesses to choose remanufactured products for their lower environmental impact. These policies contribute to the broader push for a circular economy that prioritises reuse over disposal. While recycled printers may not offer the same reliability or long-term value, remanufactured devices are built with sustainability and performance in mind, making them the preferred option for companies looking to reduce waste and adhere to EU directives.

When deciding between recycled and remanufactured equipment, the choice is clear. Remanufactured products provide superior quality, performance, and warranty coverage, aligning with the latest sustainability goals. Explore our Green Premium range for high-quality, eco-friendly solutions that meet your business needs and environmental standards.

Comments are closed.